Article

Industry Spotlight: Achieving CMMC Level 2 Compliance in Aerospace

June 10, 2025

In the defense aerospace sector, cybersecurity is mission-critical. From aircraft subsystems to satellite components and avionics software, the systems you build today directly support U.S. national security. That’s why CMMC Level 2 compliance is fast becoming non-negotiable for companies operating in this space.

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 requires organizations handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to align with all 110 practices and 320 control objectives aligned with NIST SP 800-171. For aerospace companies in the DoD supply chain, that includes both prime contractors and an extensive network of specialized suppliers and technology partners.

The challenge? Aerospace projects involve deep complexity—across R&D, manufacturing, systems integration, and export control. For many, achieving CMMC compliance requires a coordinated, multi-division approach.

Why CMMC Level 2 Matters for Aerospace Companies

Whether you're building flight control systems, integrating defense-grade GPS, or developing components for UAVs, CUI is embedded in nearly every phase of your operation. Without CMMC Level 2 certification, you may soon be ineligible for new DoD contracts or at risk of being replaced by compliant competitors.

The stakes are high—and so is the scrutiny. Aerospace programs often involve International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), proprietary technologies, and long development timelines. Demonstrating a mature cybersecurity posture isn't just a compliance issue—it's about proving your organization can be trusted to protect sensitive national defense data.

Common CMMC Challenges in Aerospace

1. Highly Distributed Teams and Supply Chains

Aerospace projects often span multiple business units, subcontractors, and geographic regions. CUI may be shared across engineering teams, design partners, and specialized fabricators. Without a clear boundary and strict control of access, the risk of data sprawl and unintentional exposure increases dramatically.

2. Mix of Cloud-Based and On-Premise Systems

Many aerospace firms are in transition—modernizing parts of their environment while still relying on legacy, on-premise systems tied to custom software or defense-specific infrastructure. Navigating CMMC compliance across hybrid IT environments introduces configuration complexity and control implementation challenges.

3. Competing Regulatory Requirements

Aerospace contractors are already managing ITAR, DFARS 7012, NIST 800-53, and possibly AS9100 standards. While overlapping, CMMC adds new demands around evidence gathering, documentation rigor, and maturity of implementation that often require crosswalking multiple frameworks to avoid duplication or conflict.

4. Engineering-Centric Culture with Limited Cyber Focus

While engineering precision is a strength in aerospace, cybersecurity isn’t always embedded in the culture or workflows. Generally speaking, engineering efforts are focused on making things better, faster, more economical, and with enabling interfaces. Cybersecurity is usually an afterthought rather than being baked in. Retrofitting cybersecurity measures is always a bigger challenge and then documenting how everything has been added presents additional difficulties.  For example, documentation of access controls that have been added after the fact can be harder. In addition, companies also struggle with ensuring that controls for incident response and log reviews are consistent across teams—not because the controls don’t exist, but because they’re not managed with CMMC in mind.

Four Strategic Moves Toward CMMC Readiness in Aerospace

1. Map and Control the Flow of CUI

In aerospace, CUI can flow across internal silos, supplier networks, and classified/unclassified environments. Mapping these pathways is critical to defining your CMMC assessment boundary. Consider whether you can deploy enclave strategies or data segmentation to limit the systems in scope while maintaining operational continuity. If that is possible, it will reduce your footprint and thus your attack surface and more than likely your cost of compliance.

2. Conduct a CMMC Gap Analysis

A structured CMMC gap analysis should start with helping you inventory where CUI exists—across design files, simulation models, shared CAD environments, or project collaboration platforms, identify assets that are in and out of scope —and not until those tasks are completed should you begin to assess your current alignment with required CMMC controls and objectives. It’s an essential first step to understand exposure and prioritize actions.

3. Align Cyber Policies with Engineering Processes

You don’t need to rewrite your entire engineering playbook—but you do need to embed cybersecurity into the way you design, build, and share data. That means role-based access controls, secure coding practices, vendor management, and system monitoring must be backed by enforceable policies and documented procedures. Reviewing and harmonizing your policies and procedures will help reduce the compliance efforts.

4. Prepare for Assessment with Realistic Testing

Once you're confident in your program, a CMMC mock assessment offers a controlled way to validate that policies, processes, and evidence hold up under real-world scrutiny and will give your team low risk opportunities to practice conversing with assessors and understanding the sorts of questions they will ask and what is really important to meeting all the requirements. In complex, high-value sectors like aerospace, this step can significantly reduce risk and avoid costly delays.

Why Early Action Pays Off

In a sector defined by high-value contracts, long timelines, and fierce competition, being CMMC-compliant isn’t just about passing an assessment—it’s about being selected for the next phase of the mission. Defense primes are already prioritizing suppliers who are ready. The further behind you fall, the more difficult it becomes to stay in the game.

Aerospace contractors who start early and integrate compliance into their broader business strategy will not only reduce assessment risk—they’ll build stronger relationships with program officers and increase their competitive standing in future bids.

Final Thoughts

CMMC Level 2 is reshaping what it means to be a trusted aerospace supplier. The complexity of the sector demands more than checkbox compliance—it requires strategic alignment across engineering, security, and executive leadership.

Whether you’re designing next-gen airframes or supporting satellite payloads, the time to prepare is now.

If you're beginning your journey, a CMMC gap analysis will uncover the roadblocks ahead. If you're confident in your posture, a mock assessment gives you the chance to pressure-test your program before the formal review.

Want to learn how we help manufacturers accelerate CMMC readiness without disrupting operations? Talk to an expert today about how the Coalfire Federal team can help you successfully achieve certification.