3 Key Differences: CMMC 2.0 vs. NIST 800-171
1. CMMC 2.0 Includes a Level-Based Model
- CMMC 2.0 classifies organizations into three levels, each with its own set of criteria
- Some DoD contracts may specify particular levels, necessitating compliance with the corresponding criteria
- Unlike NIST 800-171, CMMC 2.0 mandates third-party assessments to validate adherence to its standards
- NIST 800-171 lacks certification requirements and relies on self-assessments, given its non-regulatory status
2. CMMC 2.0 Focuses on Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Standards
- CMMC 2.0 features over 130 cybersecurity guidelines at the highest compliance level, with 110 directly aligning with NIST 800-171 standards
- CMMC 2.0 predominantly centers on CUI controls, with an extensive emphasis on their protection
- NIST 800-171, while also emphasizing CUI protection, includes standards for Non-Federal Organization (NFO) controls
3. CMMC 2.0 Includes Additional Domains Over NIST 800-171
- NIST 800-171 encompasses 14 requirement families, covering aspects such as access control, personnel security, risk assessment, and security assessments
- CMMC 2.0 elevates the importance of cybersecurity assets and the ability to recover from breaches
- Organizations adopting CMMC 2.0 must be more attuned to the threats they face and their potential impact on the handling of CUI
- CMMC 2.0 goes further by incorporating three new cybersecurity domains into its standards:
i) Asset management
ii) Recovery
iii) Situational awareness
Regardless of where you are in your CMMC compliance journey, Coalfire Federal can help. Our Suite of Certification, Compliance and Advisory Services Include:
- CMMC
- FedRAMP