3 Key Differences: CMMC 2.0 vs. NIST 800-171

1. CMMC 2.0 Includes a Level-Based Model

  •  CMMC 2.0 classifies organizations into three levels, each with its own set of criteria
  • Some DoD contracts may specify particular levels, necessitating compliance with the corresponding criteria
  • Unlike NIST 800-171, CMMC 2.0 mandates third-party assessments to validate adherence to its standards
  • NIST 800-171 lacks certification requirements and relies on self-assessments, given its non-regulatory status

2. CMMC 2.0 Focuses on Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Standards

  • CMMC 2.0 features over 130 cybersecurity guidelines at the highest compliance level, with 110 directly aligning with NIST 800-171 standards
  • CMMC 2.0 predominantly centers on CUI controls, with an extensive emphasis on their protection
  • NIST 800-171, while also emphasizing CUI protection, includes standards for Non-Federal Organization (NFO) controls

3. CMMC 2.0 Includes Additional Domains Over NIST 800-171

  • NIST 800-171 encompasses 14 requirement families, covering aspects such as access control, personnel security, risk assessment, and security assessments
  • CMMC 2.0 elevates the importance of cybersecurity assets and the ability to recover from breaches
  • Organizations adopting CMMC 2.0 must be more attuned to the threats they face and their potential impact on the handling of CUI
  • CMMC 2.0 goes further by incorporating three new cybersecurity domains into its standards:

i) Asset management

ii) Recovery

iii) Situational awareness

Regardless of where you are in your CMMC compliance journey, Coalfire Federal can help. Our Suite of Certification, Compliance and Advisory Services Include: